|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2011-12-05-CPC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
2011-12-05-CPC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 11:18:49 AM
Creation date
4/17/2013 5:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$8,000 savings if the job was bid in FY13. In response to this, Mr. Kanter <br />suggested that the request for CPA funding be reflective of the true project <br />timing and costs. He said it would be more reasonable to request the entire <br />project cost of $1,110,673 in FY13. The CPC concurred with this suggestion <br />and Mr. Keane agreed to submit a new proposal to the CPC. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5.Battle Green Master Plan Implementation, Phase II <br /> – Ms. Dawn <br />McKenna, Chair of the Tourism Committee had been asked to return to the <br />CPC to further discuss this project. She was joined by Mr. David <br />Pinsonneault, Manger of Operations at DPW. The exact cost of the proposal <br />was in flux, since the CPC removed $60,000 in costs for a traffic study at <br />Town Counsel’s direction. This cut then translated to lower supervision, <br />design/engineering and contingency costs. <br /> <br />Mr. Pinsonneault reviewed the revised budget, which included: $22,130 in <br />Design and Engineering Costs, $110,650 in construction costs, and an <br />$11,065 contingency. He described the FY13 project as it related to work <br />previously approved in FY12. There were fine differences between the two <br />projects. For instance, Phase II (FY13) will include costs to stabilize the sand <br />paths around the circumference of the Battle Green, while Phase I (FY12) <br />funds will be used to stabilize the paths from the perimeter path to the <br />monuments themselves. (This particularly applied to the work near the <br />obelisk.) Mr. Pinsonneault added that he will be supervising the work in <br />Phase II. <br /> <br />There was a general discussion of the Town approval process for the Battle <br />Green project. This issue arose because members were uncomfortable with <br />approving the proposed FY13 project without Selectmen input. Mr. Cohen <br />read the minutes of the Selectmen’s meeting from March 14, 2011, where the <br />Board voted to approve the Master Plan subject to retaining “jurisdiction to <br />make final decisions regarding design details”. Mr. Cohen noted that the <br />th <br />project will be discussed at the December 12 meeting of the Selectmen. This <br />will presumably give the CPC the direction it needs to assess the project <br />within the context of necessary Town approvals. <br /> <br />Ms. McKenna was questioned about grant applications, and whether any <br />grants could be expected for the Battle Green project. Ms. McKenna said she <br />would be applying for a grant under the “Save America’s Treasures” Program, <br />but that the application deadline was in May, well after Town Meeting would <br />vote on the project. She added that there may be funds available through the <br />National Park Service’s “American Battlefields” grant program. Mr. Cohen <br />added that the Selectmen had recently received a $10,000 contribution toward <br />renovation of the Battle Green, and that this money would be appropriate to <br />help fund the Battle Green Master Plan project. <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.