Laserfiche WebLink
upgrades would remain at $1,040,444, with $561,518 requested for FY13 and <br />$478,926 requested for FY14. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz asked if the Year 2 work could be easily “severable” to which Mr. <br />Goddard replied that it could be deferred if needed. There were no other <br />questions on this project. <br /> <br /> <br />11.Cary Memorial Building Upgrades – <br /> Mr. Goddard, Director of Facilities, <br />presented this project request for $550,000 for the development of design and <br />construction drawings for improvements to the Cary Memorial Building (as <br />recommended in the 2011 Isaac Harris Cary Memorial Building Evaluation). <br />Of the many items suggested in the report for improvement, he noted that the <br />most important were acoustical improvements, renovations of the HVAC <br />system, upgrades to the bathrooms, accessibility upgrades, and a lift to the <br />Bird Room. Phase 2 costs for this project are estimated at $7.2M. <br /> <br />Mr. Goddard recognized that the FY14 project was very high, and noted that <br />there was an option for a 4-year phased approach to the project. This would <br />necessitate a 20% premium on construction costs, however. He suggested that <br />the CPC decide upon an amount that would be reasonable for the FY14 <br />project, and that he could “work within” the CPC budget. There was a general <br />discussion of this approach, with members discussing the various aspects of <br />the building that they felt most needed repair. It was generally agreed that the <br />acoustics, the HVAC and bathrooms were priorities. Ms. McKenna made the <br />point that the Town should not eliminate the “historical aspects” of the <br />building while trying to preserve its history. She noted that items like the <br />bathrooms, were an important historical element in the building and should be <br />considered for preservation. She also noted that it would be a valuable <br />exercise to compare the present project with an earlier one to upgrade Cary <br />Memorial Hall for a performance center. Ms. Manz clarified this issue, stating <br />that the previous study only examined Cary Hall as a self-supporting <br />performance center, a standard to which the current project did not aspire. <br /> <br />Town Meeting member David Kaufman, noted that the bathrooms and HVAC <br />system would benefit from energy upgrades. In response to a question from <br />Ms. Shaw, Mr. Goddard noted that the renovations to the acoustical system <br />would be in the range of $200,000 to $250,000. Mr. Kanter suggested Mr. <br />Goddard return to the CPC with a modified project for FY14 that prioritized <br />the various upgrades for the Cary Memorial Building. <br /> <br /> <br />12.White House Stabilization – <br />Mr. Goddard presented this proposed project <br />which sought $202,000 in CPA funds for the exterior stabilization of the <br />White House. Mr. Goddard reported that there was no Board of Selectmen <br />support for a previous amendment to the project, which called for modest <br />interior stabilizations to the interior, so that it could be used by those utilizing <br />the Conscience Land (such as the Farmer’s Market patrons) and by the <br /> 5 <br /> <br />