Laserfiche WebLink
Documentation: NOI Application & Revised Drainage Calculations and <br />Site Plan 11/9/12 <br />Present for the Applicant: Scott Goddard: Goddard Consulting, LLC <br /> <br />Mr. Goddard proposed the deck/patio to be constructed so the nearest <br />point of the structure is 57 feet away from the wetlands. He described the <br />revised drainage calculations which no longer include pre-existing <br />impervious surface. Mr. Goddard reported that the stream in question is <br />intermittent based on the stream stats report findings. He described a <br />detailed planting plan in which the present vegetation of invasive species <br />will be eradicated, the area will be re-graded, and then replanted with <br />native species. <br /> <br />Comments from the Commission as follows: <br />The Commission suggested that Mr. Goddard check with Ms. Mullins on <br />the requested use of specific iron pins and caps to demarcate the bounds. <br />Mr. Kennedy commented that there were two elevations on the plan listed <br />as 229 on the east side of the dwelling and one should be 228 to match <br />into existing grade. Mr. Langseth reviewed the proposed conditions <br />attained vs. the proposed conditions unattained and mentioned that the <br />calculations are unclear. Mr. Langseth commented that there should be a <br />summary table of the drainage calculations. <br /> <br />Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to November 27, 2012 <br />at 7:30 pm at the request of the applicant, 5-0 in favor. <br /> <br />8:20 pm Cont. Hearing - NOI, 4 Turning Mill Road <br /> DEP# 201-876, BL 834 <br /> Construction of an addition within the 100-foot Buffer Zone <br /> Documentation: NOI Application, Revised Narrative and Mitigation <br />Measures and Revised Wetland Permitting Plan November 9, 2012 <br />Present for the Applicant: Victor Vizgatis and Madalene Sullivan: <br />Homeowners <br /> <br /> Mr. Vizgatis proposed the construction of an addition to an existing <br />single-family dwelling on the west side of the home with additional <br />plantings for mitigation. The homeowners wish to respect the cultural <br />resource of the house. Mr. Vizgatis explained that building the addition <br />on the north side of the house would require a good amount of excavation <br />as well as removal of two large trees, the south and east side would require <br />even deeper excavation than the north side and removal of more trees. <br />Mr. Vizgatis chose the west side because it is flat, was already previously <br />disturbed, and there would be no tree removal. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />