Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee <br />08 November 2012 <br />Summary from this meeting. <br />• PBC would like to see a tabulation of how we went from $31.1 million to $35 million. <br />• RFW needs to advise Shawmut of PBC positions <br />• Eric thinks School Committee should support PBC in the Aesthetic issues as they don't involve educational issues. Cost <br />savings on exterior veneer. Jon agrees Aesthetic issues should not be school committee issues. <br />• PBC suggest if Shawmut is not at $31.1 at 7/12 meeting we should not continue any further discussion with them and <br />start talks with CTA. <br />Ask Kevin Batt (Legal Counsel) for advice, letter from awarding authority <br />Paul to give Shawmut Fogarty estimate and show them cost model we are striving for. <br />OPM can approach 2 nd CM and see if they want to negotiate if we are not proceeding with Shawmut. <br />7.44 Update <br />7/12/12 <br />Shawmut made presentation on GMP budget and proposes revised numbers that meet budget expectation at $31,150,670. <br />PBC discuss and agree 1 set of documents should be issued for pricing. Sept 1. for GMP on 9/15/12. <br />DiNisco disagrees with reduced design contingency. Contingency down to $1,000,000 not $1,200,000. <br />In presentation Shawmut outlined the following timelines: <br />Abatement February to mid April <br />Demo Mid April to mid May <br />Site Mid May to mid August <br />Logistics for spring 2014 and summer of 2014 concerning and will require further development and discussion. <br />Eric feels having <br />• Shawmut check the drawings is a good thing. <br />• Moisture mitigation is a big item and that it warrants a separate meeting. <br />• Schedule concern for spring 2014 and use of new bldg. with old bldg. still up and no new driveway. <br />Architects will provide a LEED Update at 60% CD. <br />7.47 Value Manaeement Items <br />8/9/12 Items reviewed for determination <br />#15 Defer <br />#20 Barier One - $80,000 included in estimate so $278375 can not be deducted. <br />#25 &@ 26 No <br />#39 Hold <br />#58 DDP to confirm scope <br />#62 / 62A Yes -Alum. Feeders <br />#65 No -Puts this school at disadvantage to others <br />#66 Defer <br />#77 No <br />#31A & B Net deduct $17,000 <br />#43 Yes <br />Motion to approve the above listed value management items from the project VM list dated 8/6/12 as amended affirming the VM <br />effort at approx $1,500,00. <br />Motion Phil 2nd Chuck Vote: 5-0-0 <br />7.48 Update on GMP development <br />8/9/12 <br />Tony from Shawmut reviewed options for GMP development <br />Option 1 per original RFP <br />Option 2 bid the filed sub early <br />Option 3 same as 2 but don't bid filed subs early <br />Issue is that they can't commit to gmp @ 60 % docs because filed subs are not bid until 1005 docs. <br />Dwgs will be 60% at 9/13 mtg 100% at 12/1 <br />60 % estimate at September mtg. There should be 2 numbers from target subs for budgeting cross check to estimate. <br />Motion to approve Option #3 for GMP development with Budget updates at 60% & 90% CD. <br />Motion: Phil 2nd: Dick Vote 5 -0 -0 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />