Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
Lexington Permanent Building Committee <br />PBC Meeting Minutes <br />Meeting Date & Time: September 27, 2012 7:00 PM <br />Location: 201 Bedford Street <br />Attendees: <br />Guests: <br />27 September 2012 <br />Carl Oldenburg Peter Johnson <br />Shawmut: Tony, Peter, Mark, Maura, Jubin <br />Dick Perry Jon Himmel <br />GaryAinsle (DiNisco) <br />Eric Brown Joe McWeeney <br />CP: Paul, Jean, Joe <br />Chuck Favazzo Brigette Steins <br />Mary Ann Stewart <br />Sandy Trach <br />Index <br />1.0 General Business <br />4.0 Bridge & Bowman Elementary Schools Renovation <br />7.0 Estabrook Elementary School <br />1.0 GENERAL BUSINESS <br />1.1 Minutes <br />9/27/12 <br />Motion to approve PBC Meeting Minutes for July 2, August 2, 9, 28 and September 13, 2012. <br />Motion: Carl 2 Joe Vote: 6 -0 -0 <br />1.2 Monthly Bills <br />9/27/12 <br />Motion to approve Monthly invoices in the amount of $3,153,872.83 <br />Motion: Eric 2 Peter Vote: 6 -0 -0 <br />1.3 Meeting Minute Format (Item Relocated from 2.24 to general business) <br />For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current meeting <br />minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. <br />Mark Barrett is waiting for proposal from PSS. <br />5/10/11 <br />DPF reported a quote received for training on prolog, but could only find out of state vendors approved by the software company. <br />PBC member suggested he knew of a local firm we could get training from that would be more cost effective. <br />10/13/11 <br />DPF reported that it would appear that we would be able to setup training within the next few weeks. <br />12/1/11 <br />DPF again reported that it was hoping to set up the training within the next couple weeks. <br />4.0 Bridge & Bowman Renovation Projects <br />4.26 Roof Top Unit screening <br />11/2/11 <br />It was reported that the roof top hvac equipment would be larger than originally anticipated and could be 18 inches to 2 feet taller. <br />There was some concern expressed over the aesthetics of the larger units and the overall view of the school to the public, <br />notwithstanding any sound abatement concerns. Various options for screening and placement of support structure for future <br />screening were discussed. Currently six units suspected of a need for screening based on sound abatement were modified to include <br />roof reinforcing for future screen panels. It was discussed to increase this count to 10 to include units where screens may be desired <br />for aesthetics as well; however this motion was not acted upon, leaving just the original 6 locations <br />12/8/11 <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />