|
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE 4th REPORT, April 28, 2007, TO 2007 ATM
<br />from one form of out-of-district school to another (usually more expensive) school. The FY2008
<br />projection takes into account students currently in an out-of-district placement that are assumed also to
<br />start the FY2008 year out-of-district, as well as an assumption about new out-of-district placements. The
<br />budget assumes that the number of out-of-district students in FY2008 will be less than the number
<br />recorded in March 2007, as the school administration expects that the new in-house programs described
<br />below will result in fewer students going out-of-district and some returning in district.
<br />Out-of-District
<br />Bud et FY2007
<br />bud et FY2007 est
<br />21 March FY2008
<br />bud et % Increase
<br />FY07-FY08
<br />Total # Students 111 123 111 +0%
<br />Total Cost $6,132,539 $6,268,305 $6,912,198 +12.7%
<br />Circuit Breaker $1,800,000 $1,652,647 $1,954,739 +8.6%
<br />Net Cost to Town $4,332,539 $4,615,658 $4,957,459 +14.4%
<br />One year after the Town has incurred out-of district costs, the State will reimburse Lexington for some of
<br />the associated expenses-in other words, the assumed circuit breaker revenue in the FY2008 budget
<br />represents reimbursement of expenses incurred in FY2007, for which the Town will submit a claim in
<br />July 2007. The State will reimburse Lexington for 72-75% of the costs incurred above approximately
<br />$33,700 for each child placed out-of district; transportation, however, is not currently eligible for
<br />reimbursement. The State allocates up to 75% if the claims do not exceed the State budget for such
<br />claims. Earlier this year, for example, the Town was told to assume 72% for FY2007, but when the DOE
<br />verified that extra funds were available, school districts were told to expect 75%. In addition to the circuit
<br />breaker reimbursement, Lexington received $103,980 in extraordinary relief in FY2007, but is not
<br />budgeting any extraordinary relief in the FY 2008 budget.
<br />TRANSPORTATION
<br />Expenses for transportation of SPED students are projected to increase 25.4% from the FY2007 budgeted
<br />amount of $871,756 to $1,093,371 projected for FY2008. The budgeted increase is the result of an
<br />anticipated increase in the number of students (both in district and out of district) who will require
<br />transportation from 136 in the FY2007 budget to an anticipated 158 in FY2008, inflation in the cost of
<br />transportation, plus assumptions about the nature of the transportation required for each student.
<br />NEW PROGRAMS
<br />The school administration also initiated or expanded three new programs, scheduled to begin in
<br />September 2007, which are aimed at increasing the ability of the schools to educate students within the
<br />system and therefore mitigate the increase in out-of district expenses. An Intensive Learning Program
<br />(ILP) to serve students with autism is planned for each of the middle school and high school levels, while
<br />a third program, a Multidisciplinary Support Team (MST) for students identified as having emotional
<br />disabilities, is planned at the high school level. Students with these disabilities account for the majority of
<br />the out-of district expenses, and the school administration projects that these programs will prevent a
<br />number ofout-of district placements in the future as well as bring students currently placed out-of district
<br />back into the system. These programs are projected to cost $537,000 and result in savings of
<br />$1.376 million, for a net savings of $839,000 in the first year of the programs.
<br />The FY2008 school budget assumes a total increase of 11.4 SPED teachers and 6.0 SPED support staff
<br />for a total of 17.4 more FTEs than in the FY2007 budget. Of this increase of 17.4, 12.8 are the result of
<br />the investment in these cost-saving programs. There are a total of 2.0 SPED FTE positions and 11.0
<br />instructional assistants on the at-risk list.
<br />COMMITTEE POSITION
<br />This Committee has not yet taken a formal position on this funding request by the Schools as the latest
<br />data on the Schools request was only received the day before this report was to be printed. while we have
<br />an official meeting scheduled before Town Meeting debates this request-so we can have a formal
<br />Page 9 of 13
<br />
|