Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE 1st REPORT, APRIL 4, 2007, TO 2007 ATM <br />offered by the Town, provided that the benefits under the plan, coupled with Medicare parts A and B, are <br />of comparable actuarial value to the retiree's currently existing coverage provided by the Town. <br />As a practical matter, most of the Town's retirees have already enrolled in the Town's Medicare <br />extension plan. Acceptance of Section 18 will require that all retirees do so. There are at least 32, and <br />perhaps as many as 60, current retirees eligible for Medicare who have not enrolled in the Town's <br />extension plan. <br />Upon acceptance of the statute, each of the Town's retirees who is not already enrolled will be required to <br />provide the Town with the information necessary to effectuate his or her transfer to the Medicare <br />extension plan. The statute mandates that a retiree who does not submit the required information "shall no <br />longer be eligible for his existing health coverage." <br />The purpose and intent of this Article are to reduce the Town's costs in supplying health-care coverage to <br />its retirees and their dependents. Additionally, because all retirees will be enrolled in the same Medicare <br />extension plan provided by the Town, acceptance of Section 18 will result in the uniform treatment, <br />handling, and payment of health insurance claims and benefits. <br />If Section 18 is accepted, that Section requires the Town to pay any Medicare part B "delayed enrollment <br />penalty" which may be assessed by the Federal government on the retiree as a result of the retiree's <br />enrollment in Medicare part B at the time of his or her transfer into the Town's Medicare extension plan <br />(rather than when first eligible-typically at age 65). As indicated above, there maybe up to 60 persons <br />for whom that penalty would have to be paid. <br />The penalty is a 10% surcharge for each full 12-month period between the end of the period when the <br />retiree could have initially enrolled in Medicare part B and the end of the period when the retiree actually <br />enrolls. There is no upper limit on the surcharge. For example, if three full 12-month periods have passed, <br />the surcharge is 30%; if five, the surcharge is 50%; if 10, the surcharge is 100%; etc. Additionally, the <br />penalty applies for the entire time the individual is enrolled in part B. <br />In CY2007, the Medicare part B monthly premium is $93.50. A 10% surcharge would result in a monthly <br />penalty of $9.35, or $112.20 per year; a 30% surcharge, $28.05, or $336.60 per year; a 50% surcharge, <br />$46.75, or $561.00 per year; and a 100% surcharge, $93.50, or $1,122.00 per year. The exact amount the <br />Town would have to pay, year by year, in penalty surcharges has not yet been determined. It will depend <br />upon how many of the potential 60 retirees the Town can, by virtue of accepting the statute, require to <br />enroll in its Medicare extension plan; how many full 12-month periods for each of those retirees have <br />passed; how long each of them remains enrolled in the Town's extension plan; and how the base premium <br />changes in future years. <br />whatever the total amount is, it will offset what the Town projects as a savings from the acceptance of <br />Section 18 of about $1,200 per retiree per year for those with individual coverage; more for those with <br />family coverage. <br />Based on the CY2007 Medicare rates and surcharges, the above examples demonstrate that acceptance of <br />Section 18 will produce a net savings to the Town for each of the current retirees with individual coverage <br />who will be required to enroll in the Town's extension plan and for whom the surcharge is 100% or less. <br />For each of them, the annual penalty expense to the Town would be less than the projected $1,200 annual <br />savings. Any of those new enrollees with individual coverage for whom the surcharge is 110% or greater <br />would result in a net expense to the Town. (The percentage at which a savings changes to an expense <br />would be higher for those new enrollees with family coverage.) However, as the number of transitioned <br />retirees on the Town's extension plan decreases over time through attrition, the overall net savings to the <br />Town will increase because their penalty expense will be removed while all subsequent enrollees will <br />have j oined without any penalty. <br />Page 11 of 39 <br />