|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2006-08-31-AC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-08-31-AC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 3:26:14 PM
Creation date
3/9/2009 5:57:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2006
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 31, 2006 <br />There was a discussion of the possible need for a Special Town Meeting this fall <br />to appropriate funds for the DPW barn replacement project. Michael reported on the <br />status of planning for that project and said that the final decision whether to proceed with <br />a Special Town Meeting would likely be made at the Board of Selectmen meeting <br />scheduled for September 18. <br /> <br />There was a discussion of the reported deficit in the school department’s FY06 <br />budget earlier in the summer and the steps that were taken to resolve the problem. <br />Michael explained that the apparent shortfall was mostly attributable to the erroneous <br />allocation of certain capital expenditures to the operating budget, and that Town staff had <br />helped the school department analyze and correct the problem. <br /> <br />It was noted that this Committee still has not received any of the Superintendent’s <br />monthly status reports to the School Committee tracking the performance of actual to <br />budgeted results. Al Levine has had several contacts with the School Committee chair <br />about getting copies of these reports on a regular basis, and will follow up again. <br /> <br />Michael Young then reported some recent good news relating to Massachusetts <br />School Building Authority (MSBA) reimbursements. Thanks to diligent efforts by <br />school staff to document building expenses, MSBA reimbursements for the completed <br />secondary school renovation projects will be coming in, after completion of the final <br />project audit, about $1.3 million higher than had been anticipated after the audit. After <br />paying off bond anticipation notes (BAN’s) due August 25, a balance of $2,286,000 <br />remains. Of that balance, $453,941is attributable to exempt debt (outside the levy), and <br />must be applied to the retirement of that debt. The remainder of $1,832,659 is <br />attributable to within-levy debt. It is possible that this amount could be treated as an <br />addition to the Town’s General Fund balance during FY07, which would then become <br />available for appropriation as free cash for FY09. However, the Town’s financial staff is <br />currently studying a recent Information Guideline Release (IGR) issued by the DOR <br />(IGR No. 06-101, “Guidelines for the Application of School Building Grants”), which <br />may call for a different treatment. <br /> <br />David Kanter reported on his recent participation in the selection committee for <br />the new school department financial officer to replace Ann Giombetti, who will be <br />departing in November. There was strong support for the candidate finally selected, <br />Mary Ellen Normen Dunn, who has most recently been employed in the Natick school <br />system and previously worked with Carl Valente and Rob Addelson in the Town of <br />Needham. Dunn’s possible title will be Assistant Superintendent for Finance and <br />Operations. <br /> <br />Financial Policies. <br />4. The Committee resumed its discussion of the report and <br />recommendations of the Financial Policy Review Committee, focusing on the portion of <br />the report addressed to Reserve Policies. Specific issues discussed were the Stabilization <br />Fund (is the target level adequately defined, how large should it be, when should you <br />spend it, and how should you replenish it?), the Appropriation Committee Reserve Fund, <br />and proposed “continuing balance accounts.” <br /> - 2 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.