Laserfiche WebLink
April 27, 2005 <br /> <br />Al Levine reported that the Appropriation Committee had previously voted to <br />support an addition to the outstanding debt exclusion of up to 10%, or about $3.2 million, <br />if the Fiske construction bids came in over budget, and that the 4% figure suggested was <br />well within this range. He pointed out that to fund the overrun within the tax levy would <br />put further pressure on the operating budget and require larger operating overrides in <br />future years, and that operating overrides result in a permanent instead of a project- <br />specific tax increase. He further pointed out that there had been no changes to the scope <br />of the project originally approved by the voters, that the overruns resulted entirely from <br />unforeseeable inflation, and that to cut corners on the project would be unwise and likely <br />result in even greater costs later. <br /> <br />There was general agreement to seek a supplemental appropriation under Article <br />29 for the amount of the cost overrun and to request DOR’s approval to add this amount <br />to the outstanding debt exclusion. Because the DOR only permits a one-time increase to <br />a debt exclusion, it was also agreed that the amount requested should be something more <br />than $1.3 million in case there are additional unforeseen contingencies. <br /> <br /> Other Article 29 Supplemental Appropriations. <br />3. There ensued a discussion <br />of other supplemental appropriations that would be proposed under Article 29 for capital <br />improvement projects authorized in prior fiscal years, including emergency repairs to the <br />Estabrook roof and the completion of certain improvements to the town office buildings <br />that had gone over budget. There was also extensive discussion whether $83,000 of the <br />amount requested for the Town Building Envelope Program was more properly treated as <br />an operating expense or a capital expenditure. <br /> <br />Article 30 School Capital Projects and Equipment. <br />4. School Committee <br />Chair Tom Griffiths and Facilities Manger Dana Ham reported on the results of a recently <br />completed energy audit of the Clarke Middle School, evolving plans for energy-related <br />capital projects that would most effectively implement those recommendations, and the <br />current state of the School Committee’s discussions with the Capital Expenditures <br />Committee about the amounts that would be requested for school capital projects under <br />Article 30 and the application of the cash capital policy. Mr. Griffiths also reported on <br />the School Committee’s anticipated request under Article 30 for funds for architectural <br />and engineering design funds for reconstructing and adding an addition to the School <br />Administration Building and circulated a conceptual rendering of the proposed White <br />House renovation. <br /> <br />Article 31 School Technology Equipment. <br />5. Finally, there was a brief <br />discussion of Article 31 and the funds requested by the School Committee for the <br />maintenance and upgrade of school technology systems. <br /> <br />Appropriation Committee’s First Supplemental Report. <br />6. Immediately <br />following the Budget Collaboration Meeting, the Appropriation Committee voted 8-0 to <br />approve its Supplemental Report to the 2005 Annual Town Meeting prepared by Paul <br />Hamburger, and to be presented that evening by Deborah Brown. <br /> - 2 - <br /> <br />