Laserfiche WebLink
HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT <br />Executive Summary <br />The Stone Building <br />LEXINGTON, MA <br />It was a privilege to be selected to study and conceive of strategies to preserve Lexington's venerable <br />Stone Building. The challenges of preserving the historic fabric of this distinguished old building while <br />facilitating its rebirth as a functional, accessible community resource are many, but the rewards are rich <br />for the residents of Lexington. Paramount in our approach was the retention of the building's uniquely <br />important historic character and its embodied association with Asher Benjamin and the Greek Revival in <br />American architecture, beautifully expressed in the East Lexington neighborhood in residential buildings <br />and especially in the Follen Church. <br />Today, after performing the Historic Structure Report and Recommendations, we have a deep <br />understanding of the historic significance of the Stone Building as one of the United State's earliest <br />Lyceums built purposefully for enlightened dialogue and learning. We know which of the issues observed <br />in examination of the physical condition are of real concern, and which can be readily managed. We <br />appreciate the constraints and opportunities of the historic building, and have envisioned a rehabilitation <br />scenario that helps achieve the community uses envisioned by the Town and would continue the tradition <br />of intellectual discourse and lively public use for the citizens of Lexington. We also have cost <br />recommendations attached to immediate repairs, permanent stabilization of the historic building, and <br />renovations and additions that will expand the accessibility and functionality of the building and extend <br />its life within the community for generations to come. <br />In June 2009, Menders, Torrey & Spencer, Inc. (MTS) was engaged by the Town of Lexington, acting <br />through Carl F. Valente, Town Administrator, to provide a detailed Historic Structure Report for the <br />Stone Building. Stated requirements included identifying changes in the building over time, assessing <br />stabilization needs, restoration plans, paint analysis of paint schemes over time, preparing a cyclical <br />maintenance plan and adaptive use and universal access assessment. <br />The report's overarching objective was to lay the groundwork for understanding the history of the <br />building and describe needs to be met for use of the building compatible with its history. The study is <br />broken into four parts and begins with an historical analysis of the historic setting and context, the <br />rationale for construction of The Stone Building, and a chronology of use history. Next is the architectural <br />history, an annotated chronology of the building from 1833 to the completion of this report. Following <br />that are four pages of floor plans illustrating the conjectural original construction, changes in the 19"' <br />century, the 1946 -1947 renovation and the 2009 plan. With history as a foundation, the report then <br />describes structural deficiencies and building code concerns, assesses the historic building fabric, <br />identifies character - defining features, describes and prioritizes preservation treatments, provides estimates <br />for those treatments, and lays out a cyclical maintenance plan. <br />The second part of the report contains the materials investigations. Exterior paint analysis has chronicled <br />19 generations of exterior painting, including surprising early paints that included sand paints and <br />pigments. Interior analysis shows less layering, as is expected, and speculation about use of calcimine <br />paint that has left no trace. The section concludes with a listing of character - defining features, which are <br />physical elements of building history that tie directly to its historical significance as an early Lyceum. <br />Our recommendations begin with conditions assessment of the building today. Following that is a <br />description of work to be executed in the Fall and Winter of 2009 as immediate stabilization, projected at <br />a cost of $15,000. Long -term preservation of the historic building consists of restoring the building <br />envelope at a projected cost of $205,000. Finally, interior rehabilitation and construction of an addition in <br />the not -too- distant future is described at a projected cost of $1,625,000. <br />Menders, Torrey & Spencer, Inc. vu <br />2009 <br />