|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-11-19-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-11-19-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
1/26/2009 3:07:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of November 19, 2008 <br />school. <br /> <br />Mr. Waitt said he was not finding direction from the Board regarding density and was there any limit on <br />the balanced housing development, a density that the Board would not be interested in seeing. Mr. Hornig <br />said the Board is diverse. He felt no unit would be too small but assumed that they would not want to go <br />smaller than 2,000 square feet. Mr. Waitt said if he could not get better direction then they would go with <br />the conventional. <br /> <br /> Mr. Galaitsis said he did not want to adversely impact the Town finances by increasing student <br />population on-site above what would be expected with a conventional subdivision; and he did not want a <br />higher density development to lower the 40B-affordable ratio of the Town. He could support a site <br />sensitive development or balanced housing development, but he wanted to see specific numbers on a <br />spread sheet for the proposed units before making any commitments. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz said she did not have a limit on the lower numbers and would fine with single, attached or <br />townhouses as long as they were smaller homes. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo said he would favor a balanced housing development, but what were the goals of the <br />developer? Mr. Waitt said that he was not in favor of 40 units at 2,000 square feet. Mr. Canale said he <br />had no problems with 11-40 units, but there were particular issues he was trying to envision. He wanted <br />to see more neighborhood participation. How does the close proximity to the school and the major <br />walking route play out? <br /> <br />Audience comments: <br />?? <br />There were concerns about the children walking to school;, fix the rotary and Diamond School <br />problems first before developing. <br />?? <br /> The children in K-5 would go to Estabrook School and driving those children would be adding to <br />the traffic problems already present. That 40 units might be added on one road was horrifying; it <br />would be a nightmare. Make that road entrance as far away from the rotary as possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said there was a mix of enthusiasm on the Board for high density and not a lot of enthusiasm <br />for the conventional plan. A significant improvement to traffic would allow them to do what they would <br />want. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.