Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of November 19, 2008 <br />of owners on Hartwell Avenue most were small and won’t go for a special permit. Mr. McWeeney said <br />Hartwell Avenue redevelopment would be a slow process. <br /> <br />Mr. George Burnell said the Board of Selectmen did not want to see competing proposals from the <br />Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Advisory Committee and the Planning Board. The <br />Planning Board should take the lead and not repair the past damage, but rather look at what was needed <br />for the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Patrick Mehr asked if this was what the town wanted. He felt that the town should be more like <br />Lincoln. He said the town should encourage fewer students per lot as this seemed to be the key to <br />Lincoln being able to provide excellent services without a commercial base. <br /> <br />*****************************SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATION************************* <br />Lexington Gardens, 91 & 93 Hancock Street, Sketch Plan: Present were Joe Marino from Homes <br />Development, John Esserian, the applicant, and Rick Waitt and Brian Timm from Meridian Associates. <br />Mr. Waitt explained that 91 Hancock was a single-family home and 93 Hancock was Lexington Gardens. <br />The site has 10.95 acres with a 6,000 square foot piece of land that may become part of the parcel (it was <br />not clear at this time). The parcel is zoned RO but across the street is RS. The proof plan shows an 11-lot <br />conventional subdivision including a 50-foot right of way with sight distance in excess at both entrances. <br /> <br />If a balanced housing development were used the GFA would not exceed a total of 79,200 square feet and <br />impervious surface would be limited to 91,866 square feet. The conventional was also in consideration for <br />this development. <br /> <br />Board Comments: <br />Mr. Canale said he hoped that the applicant would not do a conventional plan. A balanced housing <br />development or site sensitive development would be better. It would be important to preserve the Victory <br />Garden as a feature, which would not be possible with the conventional plan. The parcel borders school <br />and conservation land. The road configuration at the rotary was an issue; improving it and making it safer <br />would make the development more attractive. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo asked if the impervious surface was 50% with the planting beds. Mr. Waitt said that was an <br />estimate since there was a lot of pavement between the planting beds. Mr. Zurlo said a balanced housing <br />development would be attractive with an affordable component. The types of general housing unit mix the <br /> <br />