|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-11-12-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-11-12-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
1/26/2009 3:05:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of November 12, 2008 <br />Ms. Manz said that while she sympathizes with requiring LOS D for affected intersections, that <br />requirement would become a block. She was uncomfortable with banking CM mitigation funds to be used <br />townwide, rather than reserving at least some portion of the funds for the zone immediately affected. <br />Betterments should be considered to bring in monies for improvements sooner. It might be necessary to <br />use all three approaches for substantial improvements. It might be necessary to charge for virtually every <br />parking space to get enough monies for needed improvements. Looking at Beal’s TDM proposal for <br />performance incentives, there needs to be a determination as to whether the Town wants funds or wants a <br />reduction in single occupancy vehicle trips. She would prefer actually discouraging trips. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo said the Board needs to understand more of the details and would prefer promoting the work <br />being done in the area over collecting funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said “do no harm” would be a bad policy considering the existing LOS for pedestrians and <br />bicycles. The wording should promote equality for all mobility options. With regards to Hartwell Avenue <br />there needs to be a determination of what would happen at buildout, what would be needed, how much it <br />would cost, and how to share between the developer, Town, State and Federal funding. Whenever <br />applicants put funds into the mitigation account the Town should match the funds. A traffic study should <br />be done that is more concerned with the average daily trips than peak hours. The base level of parking <br />could first be established. The Board should determine what type of activity would be desirable, such as <br />laboratory over medical use, and set the minimums based on that rather than a bonus for trip reduction <br />levels. <br /> <br />Ms. Ginna Johnson, Associate Member, said Lexington should set a standard of excellence. Why should <br />less perfect standards be allowed to impact the quality of life for residents? Decide what intersection LOS <br />should be and the cost to bring it to that level. <br /> <br />Ms. Susan Yanofsky, Economic Development Officer said with any plan the Board would need to <br />consider workability, enforceability and how it would affect our competitiveness. <br /> <br />Mr. Larry Smith said a practical example would be if you increase the square footage to three million. <br />The monies for mitigations per square foot would go into a fund matched by the Town rather then burden <br />new developers. Developers are limited on the tab they could afford. He did not like trip wires for LOS <br />or using average daily traffic. That would make it far too complicated. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.