Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of July 9, 2008 Page 5 <br /> <br />stand-alone document; what was the issue? Mr. Thuma said the current level of service on Wood Street is <br />F and it cannot support increased development without having a negative impact on quality of life on <br />Wood Street. Ms. Manz said incorporating as many measures as possible to prevent traffic from <br />worsening would be necessary, but it was not reasonable to expect the existing congestion to be fixed or <br />resolved before any new development would take place. Mr. Galaitsis said traffic will generally increase <br />but without TDM it will go up proportionally with the FAR. <br /> <br />Ms. Jeanne Krieger, Board of Selectmen said there was a Lexington-Waltham corridor agreement looking <br />at uniform TDM policies in the four towns and providing alternatives to single occupancy vehicles. <br />There is expected to be an additional 6,000,000 square feet in the next year and an increase of 100,000 <br />trips daily. Approximately half the traffic was through traffic and would increase. The amount of <br />commercial development would add a small amount to the existing traffic. <br /> <br />***************************COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT***************************** <br />Ledgemont, Beal Company, CD Rezoning: The Beal Company came in to give updates since the last <br />meeting. In attendance are Peter Nichols, Gary Larson, Joe Gloski and Ed Grant. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson said plan revisions show the conservation easements and trail easements along the north edge <br />and east edge to Hayden Road, wetlands, and buffers. The Ledgemont 3 building is 50 feet away from the <br />wetlands and creates a center space near the parking that already exists. The area currently has a <br />substantial amount of fill from the past and the location would minimize impacts and allow for less <br />clearing of mature trees. The residential zone line and 100 foot setback establishes the building 200-300 <br />feet away from the property line. All setbacks would be honored on the site. Mr. Gloski said the building <br />would be 140 feet back from Spring Street and then the site drops. The roof elevation would be 336 feet <br />with a mean grade of 280 feet; the building would be 56 feet tall with three floors above the mean grade <br />and three levels of parking below and a 51,000 square foot print. There would be a 12-15 foot enclosure <br />on the roof. This would be a LEED certified building. <br /> <br />Board comments and questions: <br />?? <br />Why would this be a better location then the hilltop near Spring Street proposed four years ago? <br />Mr. Nichols said the design and location were not acceptable at that time. The knolls create a <br />natural setting and entrance to the complex. This would be for the VistaPrint expansion and <br />would keep it closer to the existing building. <br />?? <br />The concerns were the impingement in the buffer area, the kind of visual intrusion on the <br /> <br />