Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of June 25, 2008 <br />***************************SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATION*************************** <br />341 Marrett Road, Preliminary Balanced Housing Development (BHD): In attendance were Rick Waitt <br />and Brian Timm of Meridian Associates, Ron Lopez, applicant, Doug Rae and Dan Harrington, attorney. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo had recused himself originally because he had lived in the carriage house and made a <br />development proposal approximately six years ago. There was also a matter of a personal debt to the <br />previous property owners which had been forgiven by one of the parties. The State Ethics Commission <br />said he recommended full disclosure but recusal was not required. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said the main discussion points were where the bulk of the development would be located, <br />either in the flat area or moved towards Wachusett Driveand perhaps with less gross floor area (GFA). <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis said because of the slope the buildings with the cellars would appear to be four stories. He <br />wanted the bottom floors to be counted as basements. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said in terms of the specific site and close proximity to Marrett Road and Waltham Street he <br />wondered if this was an appropriate type of housing arrangement and was especially concerned with the <br />excessive bulking of units 1-5. The applicant should reach out to the abutters. The next step no matter <br />what it was should be looked at closely with regards to the height and bulk of the structures for units 1-5. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz asked if there was a possibility of moving the units into the center and minimizing the <br />roadway. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said there were a lot of minor changes need such as the path and adjusting the location of the <br />units. He was uncomfortable with the massing. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis said as the project now stands units 1-5 were massed against the property line on flatter <br />ground. This area would contain 40-50% of the development, whereas with a conventional subdivision it <br />would only contain 25% of the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo said there was a significant issue with what was happening concerning units 1-5 and it could <br />affect the number of units allowed. There needed to be significant work done to resolve these issues. He <br />thought they might need to remove a unit, reposition the buildings, or change road access and grading. <br /> <br /> <br />