Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of June 25, 2008 <br />closely together so that by the time it gets to Town Meeting it will have Board support and conditions for <br />approval. He suggested that the Planning Board be the special permit granting authority (SPGA). <br /> <br />When asked if they would be rezoning the boundary portion of their property which is zoned residential <br />to commercial, Mr. Nichols said it was possible, but they would not build any closer than they could now. <br />Mr. Canale said there has been a shift in the Town’s concept of acceptable floor area, traffic, size and <br />location, but he was not sure a building closer to residents would be a better choice. The Conservation <br />Committee’s Open Space Recreation Plan was a month away from final approval and is expected to <br />document the importance of Oxbow Road from Watertown to Concord. A piece of this old road is <br />located on the property and Mr. Canale hoped that it would be restored as a publicly accessible pedestrian <br />path. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo asked how much square feet exist on the site today? Mr. Nichols said Ledgemont 1 has <br />123,000 square feet and Ledgemont 2 has 156,00 square feet. Mr. Zurlo asked if there had been any <br />updated traffic studies. Mr. Canale said the four year old Patriot Partner study was updated with a two- <br />page document this January. Mr. Nichols said they had hired BSC to do a study. Mr. Zurlo said he was <br />interested in not seeing a shift in vehicular access to Spring Street and wanted to keep the main entrance <br />at Hayden Road. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz wanted to know how many stories would be built. Mr. Nichols said four stories would be <br />stepped up and built into the cliff. Ms. Manz asked if would it be outside of the 100-foot wetlands buffer. <br />Mr. Nichols said it would be built within, but they would work with the Conservation Commission. The <br />buffer between the building and residential properties would be no closer than the garage is now. Ms. <br />Manz said that there would probably be more objections from the Woodhaven neighbors than if the <br />building was closer to Spring Street because of visibility and lighting issues. She preferred the entrance <br />to be from Hayden Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis said it would be helpful to have sketches with footprints and an indication of how they <br />would accommodate the extra parking. He would like to see the old plan, new plan and something in <br />between. Stepping up the building might make it more visible and he would like to see what the residents’ <br />winter views would be. An evolution of the old plan to the new proposal should be made available. Mr. <br />Nichols said all the new parking would be within the structure and they don’t want to build more than <br />they would need. <br /> <br /> <br />