Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of June 11, 2008 Page 3 <br /> <br />Mr. Waitt said the buildings were still in the design phase. Mr. Lopez said the attics all have pull down <br />ladders and he was still working on the design of the roofs of the stepped units. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis said visually the units appeared to be 3½ stories, which he considered undesirable, but was <br />pleased that the conventional plan was not being pursued. He stated that a good design should also benefit <br />the abutters. He indicated that in a conventional subdivision (based on the proof plan) there would be one <br />unit near the east border, which would account for 25% of the structural square footage. However, the <br />proposed BHD has five units, which is about 45% versus 25%, and, in totality, much bigger than the <br />biggest conventional house. He suggested moving the group of units to the end of the drive next to the big <br />house and getting rid of the carriage house. Ms. McCall-Taylor said the Historical Commission does not <br />want the carriage house razed. Mr. Galaitsis said he was not aware of that, but they may need to do <br />something else to relieve the pressure on the eastern border. <br /> <br />Mr. Waitt said the reason the units were moved was because the Board wanted the units moved off the <br />slopes and it would save trees. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said the sketches were helpful, but on the locus plans the structures were not identified and <br />need to be on the next submission. What is adjacent to the parcel with units 4 & 5? At 367 Waltham <br />Street are a single-family residence, a garage, and two residential condo units above commercial office <br />space. Ms. McCall-Taylor said the zone line runs through the middle of the lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said in terms of the path, it would be required for his approval. If a bicycle path is not <br />feasible, they should justify why not. Would all the tall evergreens in front be removed? Mr. Gwozdz said <br />they are removing them all due to the width requirement for the pavement. Mr. Canale said that it <br />appeared to be an overly aggressive stormwater management system; what was being proposed for lawn <br />area as opposed to natural landscape and roof runoff? Mr. Waitt said the roof runoff would go into its own <br />infiltration systems, and overland drainage would go down the drive into a catch basin. At this point <br />steepness made it difficult to do much else and the lots are too small for bio-swales. This would be <br />discussed this more at the definitive stage. Mr. Canale said he did not see any plantings on Marrett Road. <br />It is a matter of health since the trees could capture particulates from the traffic. He also wanted to <br />minimize lawn areas. Regarding the roadway access and width, direction should come from the Board of <br />Selectmen regarding sustainability and encouraging the Town to have the right sized emergency vehicles <br />so not to require excessive pavement. Mr. Canale asked what units 4-6 looked like from Marrett Road and <br />what was the nature of the neighborhood discussion? <br /> <br />