|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-05-14-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-05-14-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 12:14:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of May 14, 2008 <br /> <br />Ms. Boer asked if the retaining wall was owned by the Town. Mr. Hornig said no. Mr. Waitt said the <br />frontage is approximately 90 feet with the wall all along it. He doesn’t know where the drive is going, but <br />will try for a minimal 10 to 12 feet wide, and the house and drive will be placed for minimal disruption. <br />Mr. Hornig said waivers for the pavement width and edge of right of way are the only issues, not the <br />placement of the driveway. Mr. Zurlo said the use of the property is not indicated but he assumes it is one <br />dwelling. Mr. Waitt said that if it were more then one dwelling he would have to file another type of plan <br />with other information. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said his first choice is an 18-foot paving width, and second is 20 feet. Mr. Galaitsis said he is <br />flexible but wants any savings from waivers put into extension of the paved area. Ms. McCall-Taylor said <br />18 feet was not reviewed with the fire department but that 18 feet had been used for interior drives, not <br />roadways. Mr. Hornig asked if the wall along the front of the property would be moved? Mr. Zurlo said <br />blasting is a big concern and should be kept as shown so not to invade the stone wall. Mr. Galaitsis said <br />he could support leaving the 20-foot width as is. Mr. Hornig said that it is a bad thing to leave retaining <br />walls in the right of way. Mr. Waitt said a utility pole is more dangerous. Mr. Waitt said if Robbins Road <br />were straightened out, the edge of the pavement would be pulled back from the wall. He indicated that <br />they would agree to pave the transition areas and install boundary markers for the right of way. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said since it is less than 24 feet they could pave approximately 20 additional feet. He proposed <br />that the following conditions be placed on the road construction plan: gravel transition areas be paved; the <br />side of the road toward the retaining wall be straightened; two catch basins be rebuilt per engineering; that <br />the limit of work be moved down Plymouth Road to incorporate the basins;, and, that the corners of the <br />property be marked with permanent boundaries. Mr. Zurlo wanted notification to the abutters two weeks <br />prior to paving. Mr. Canale said to ask for e-mail addresses of those in the audience to facilitate <br /> <br />notification. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 4-0, to approve the road construction plan for <br />Robbins Road with Mr. Canale’s and Mr. Zurlo’s conditions. <br /> <br />********************************* MINUTES****************************************** <br />Review of Minutes: The Board reviewed and corrected the minutes for the April 23, 2008. On a motion <br />duly made and seconded, it was voted, 4-0, to approve the minutes as amended. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.