|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-02-13-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-02-13-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2019 2:46:50 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 11:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of February 13, 2008 <br />Mr. Zurlo, as co-chair of the EDTF, said the data from Larry Smith would help to advance the <br />conversation, but is not in parallel with the process of the EDTF. He felt the information from the <br />consultant would be available by summer and could be used with community input and Mr. Smith’s data <br />to develop a reasonable approach. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said the Selectmen ranged from favoring allowing expansion of businesses along Hartwell <br />Avenue as long as there is no increase in cars to allowing a .94 FAR along the entire road. In order to <br />make a decision one needs to look at the fiscal impacts and environmental concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig asked if what we get in June from the EDTF’s consultant would be the final information. Mr. <br />Zurlo said the consultant is doing two presentations. Mr. Hornig said we might support the increase in the <br />FAR sometime, but now the timing is bad, as the EDTF needs to finish its work. Density increases need <br />to be done with a plan as how to address the infrastructure needs. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz said this is a rough timetable. The Town should wait for the EDTF study and plan on how to <br />address the infrastructure needs. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said that the Board needs to address each of the articles individually for reports to Town <br />Meeting. <br /> <br />Article 54, Mixed Uses in CM District: Mr. Canale said the basic premise is to increase economic <br />development. If you want to support existing business you should expand the definition of accessory use. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis asked what is the rationale for 7,500 square foot stores? <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo said more research was needed to get the numbers right. If the additional uses are just serving <br />the area businesses they are too large, if they are supporting businesses, then they should be accessory. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz said she is uncomfortable with 7,500 square feet being the right number; it seems too large. <br /> <br />Article 55, CRO District Floor Area Ratio: Ms. Manz said she has the same concerns here as she did with <br />what is the appropriate FAR in the CM district. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said what he finds most problematic is if it is all right to change the FAR in the CRO zone, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.