|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-02-13-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-02-13-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2019 2:46:50 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 11:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the Meeting of February 13, 2008 Page 3 <br /> <br />were the revenue generators. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said the Planning Board is using current terms and figures to update the bylaw. The Board <br />can’t use what people thought 12 years ago, and they are not predicting secondary effects. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Bicknell, Housing Partnership Board, asked that the words “encourage the development of <br />affordable housing whenever feasible ”previously found in section 10 be put back into the proposed <br />version. <br /> <br />Mr. Sandy said when he suggested reducing the number below 2,700 square feet GFA he was not <br />suggesting that it be reduced to 1,000 square feet. The GFA for Peacock Farm houses is 1,800 square feet <br />and that is fine for many people. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis said he had a couple of comments. He said that a minority report gets five minutes and he <br />would not want to split his time. He said the current bylaw needs to be fixed, as some of the words are <br />ambiguous. The guidelines were applied for the first five to seven years and only recently are the <br />developers being allowed to go to the maximum limits. If the bylaw is abandoning some of the impact <br />measures, the Town should get something back. He was in favor of 7,200 square feet for the GFA and <br />using the proof plan as the base for multipliers. He was not in favor of removing other controls. There is <br />more open space required. One of the key things to him is comparable impacts. He also felt that the <br />guideline of providing smaller units was being ignored. <br /> <br />Mr. Arthur Katz, precinct 3, said the changes are proposed because the Board is not happy with current <br />regulations. Now they are more restrictions; why would these work? Mr. Hornig said he didn’t agree that <br />the current bylaws don’t work, they are just trying to improve and simplify the bylaw while meeting the <br />expectations of others. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo said that as a new member of the Planning Board the current zoning bylaws and regulations are <br />hard to decipher. The revisions offer clarity to the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis said we got early input from businesses and he would like more input from others. Ms. <br />McCall-Taylor said that the staff had sought early input from many boards and committees, as well as <br />from the development community. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.