|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-01-30-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-01-30-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:25 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 11:06:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of January 30, 2008 <br />Mr. Todd Cataldo, developer, asked if there was an effective date on this? Mr. Hornig said the Board did <br />not discuss a date yet. Mr. Cataldo said an offshoot of this would be people putting their houses lower in <br />the water table and affecting the hydrology of the neighborhood. The four corners of the lot was instituted <br />for lots flat at the street and then sloped, allowing houses to have a positive pitch and not be built in holes. <br />The enforcement of this was only started in the last year and we are seeing lower houses. <br /> <br />Ms. Jeanne Zerhoffer, who spoke on behalf of her parents Mr. & Mrs. Derban who could not attend, <br />asked what is the purpose of the height restriction and what general service to the public does it offer? Mr. <br />Hornig responded that it would help to control the impacts of construction on neighborhoods. Ms. <br />Zerhoffer said the only thing it affects is the value of the potential teardowns. <br /> <br />Mr. Ed Cain, a builder from Bedford who builds in town, asked about a phase-in date and is opposed to <br />the changes. He said it limits the flexibility, which allows builders to do a good job. It will limit the <br />ability to fix water problems. There will be unintended changes such as larger footprints since they would <br />lose a whole story. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale, Planning Board Member, said he wished to make a statement. He may be developing his <br />own land and had recused himself from the discussion of the Special Permit Residential Development <br />discussion but had thought this article would not be a problem, but is now recusing himself from the <br />consideration of this article. <br /> <br />Ms. Karen Addelson, 16 Winchester Drive, said this would limit what landowners can do with their land <br />and lower the value of the land. Who would pay the landowners for their losses? <br /> <br />Mr. Patrick Mehr, 31 Woodcliffe Road, asked how are the measurements made? Look at 11 Marlboro <br />Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale, Shade Street, said he is speaking as a resident and he felt 35 feet is more then generous. <br /> <br />Ms. Edith Sandy, 353 N. Emerson Road, said she heard about the loss of property values if you can’t do <br />40 feet in height, yet there are neighbors who lose the enjoyment of their properties when they lose their <br />views. <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Herring, 20 Ward Street, said there was a recent change and questioned why is it not enforced. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.