Laserfiche WebLink
July 26, 2007 Minutes 3 <br /> Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals <br /> July 26, 2007 <br /> Board Members Present: Chairman — Arthur C. Smith, Nyles N. Barnert, Maura L. Sheehan, <br /> Judy J. Uhrig and Associate Carolyn C. Wilson <br /> Staff present: David George, Zoning Administrator and Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk <br /> Town legal council, Attorney Kevin Batt was present for this hearing. <br /> Petition Address: 64 Cary Avenue <br /> The relief sought is for an APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR <br /> in letter dated June 11, 2007 in accordance with section 135 -10A of the Code of the Town of <br /> Lexington. <br /> The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:46 PM by reading the legal notice and described <br /> information received from the petitioner relative to the petition. <br /> Prior to the hearing, the petition and supporting data were reviewed by the Building <br /> Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Town Engineer, Health Director, Board of <br /> Selectmen, Zoning Administrator, Planning Board and the Historic District Commission. <br /> Comments were received from the Conservation Department, the Planning Administrator and the <br /> Zoning Administrator. <br /> Attorney Edmund Grant, representing the petitioner, Charles F. Litchfield. Mr. Litchfield is the <br /> son and Power of Attorney for the property owner, Louise Peterson. <br /> Attorney Grant gave the history of the property. Mrs. Peterson had purchased the property as <br /> separate lots in 1957 and since that time has paid separate tax bills and separate sewer <br /> betterments in 1963, all the time believing they were separate parcels. Attorney Grant spoke of <br /> the inconsistencies regarding Grandfathered lots in the past. <br /> Charles Litchfield spoke of the family history with the property. His mother is now in a Nursing <br /> facility and they would like to be able to sell the separate lots to use the money for her care. <br /> Questions from the Board: <br /> One Board member asked about the driveway, which would be within the setback of 62 Ward <br /> Avenue if the lots were divided. Applicant stated the driveway originally predated the purchase <br /> but was expanded slightly in 1986. <br />