Laserfiche WebLink
July 12, 2007 Minutes 10 <br /> One of the Board members asked if the owner had any documentation on the soil problems. The <br /> owner had tried to get something but hadn't. It was asked about the Conservation Commissions <br /> concern for the impervious surface, did they get profession statement regarding the water. <br /> Owner said he knew where the water was from his own experience. <br /> A Board member asked about the windows on the second floor. There is only storage on the <br /> second level, the dormers are for light. The building is 20 -feet high. <br /> There were no questions from the audience. <br /> Scott Coutts, 293 Bedford Street spoke in opposition of the petition, saying they had the same <br /> issue in June of 2002. The applicant had appeared before the Board and at that time the Board <br /> felt the applicant had alternatives and denied the request. At the hearing in 2002 the petition had <br /> not presented the water argument. <br /> Richard Coutts, an Architect and brother to abutter Scott Coutts spoke in opposition on behalf of <br /> his brother. He felt the flooding was not reason for a hardship. He felt there were many ways of <br /> fixing it. <br /> Peter Daus Haberle, 63 North Hancock Street spoke in favor of the petition. <br /> Hearing was closed at 9:12 pm. <br /> On a motion by Nyles Barnert and seconded by Maura Sheehan, the board voted 4 -1, with Judy <br /> Uhrig opposing, to approve the VARIANCE in accordance with section 135 -35, Table 2 for an <br /> 8 -foot side set back instead of the required 15 -feet and a 10 -foot rear set back instead of the 15- <br /> required. Please note this is a change from the 5 -foot rear setback requested. <br /> Submitted by Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk <br />