Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals June 23, 2005 <br /> Present: Chairman Judith J. Uhrig, Nyles N. Barnert, John J. McWeeney, Associate Commissioners <br /> Martha Woods sitting for Arthur Smith and Carolyn Wilson sitting for Maura L. Sheehan <br /> Petition Address: 177 Bedford Street <br /> The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:56 pm by reading the legal notice and described information <br /> received from the Petitioner relative to the Petition. Letters were received from the Design Advisory <br /> Committee and the Communication Advisory Committee. No comments from any other Board or <br /> Committee. <br /> Information received by the applicant: Zoning Analysis Supporting Statement, Engineer Report, <br /> Affidavit of Radio Frequency Expert, MPE Power Density Calculations, Antenna Specifications, MDPH <br /> Memorandum, Vicinity TOPO Map, Service Coverage Maps, List of Existing Omnipoint facilities in <br /> Lexington and contiguous Municipalities, Affidavit Regarding Equipment Noise Levels, Affidavit <br /> regarding FAA Lighting/Marking, NEPA Compliance Documentation, FCC License, Evidence of Legal <br /> Interest in Subject Property, Evidence of Non - Interest from Town of Lexington, Site Plans, Structural <br /> Affidavit, Photograph Simulations, Proposed Faux Flag Pole Specification Sheet and SHPO Submittal <br /> package in lieu of NEPA Report not fully completed. <br /> The relief sought is for a special permit to install and operate a wireless communication facility. <br /> Adam Braillard, Attorney for Omnipoint, presented the petition. Addressed the concerns of the DAC. <br /> Specifications for tower: 3 carriers, 100 feet tall, base 42" diameter and top 25" diameter. Discussed <br /> the possibility of 12' x 18' flag hung on the tower to make it look like a flagpole. <br /> Questions from the Board: <br /> Nyles Barnert: What was the diameter of the Balloon used for the testing: Answer: 3 '/z feet wide. <br /> Judy Uhrig: The Church of our Redeemer is only a' /z mile from this site, why do you need towers so <br /> close together? Answer: The tower at the Church of Our Redeemer just doesn't fill the gap of need. <br /> There is some overlapping and T- Mobile has some aggressive building plans. <br /> John McWeeney: Is there information available to say what companies are on the towers? Answer: <br /> FCC registered towers are listed but no who is on them. <br /> John McWeeney: Do you advertise with other company's to see who else would be interested in going <br /> on towers. Answer: This is where T- mobile needs coverage and that is all we consider. <br /> Martha Wood: What color will the pole be? Answer: White <br /> Nyles Barnert: Would like them to produce a bond to take the tower down should it be vacated. <br /> Judy Uhrig: Where exactly is it going? As you stand at the last parking space it is a 30 x 30 space about <br /> 50 feet out in front of the rusted fence. <br /> Carolyn Wilson: When you say the noise would be no more than a refrigerator, is that for all together or <br /> for each one. Answer: That would be for each one. To hear it at the closest structure to tower you'd <br /> really have to listen for it. <br /> Martha Wood: If something would go down and need maintenance what type of vehicle would be <br /> responding? Answer: Typically a Ford Explorer. <br />