Laserfiche WebLink
September 28, 2006 Minutes 4 <br /> David Williams asked if they received three separate tax bills. Answer was yes. <br /> Questions /Comments from the audience: <br /> Norman Newlands of 49 Grandview Avenue said the "shed" mentioned that was on the lot was <br /> not a shed but a garage. He has a copy of the plot plan from 1964. His mother had originally <br /> owned the property. <br /> Susan Newlands of 49 Grandview Avenue that the current owners moved the driveway took the <br /> shed down and moved the swing set. <br /> Norman Peterson of 30 Estabrook Road presented to the Board a photograph of the house with a <br /> swing -set and driveway on the lot that he had received from the accessor's office. <br /> No one spoke in favor of the petition. <br /> Lena Young of 28 Estabrook Road and Mike Schroeder of 2 Welch Road spoke in opposition. <br /> Hearing was closed at 8:47 pm. <br /> Discussion: <br /> The Board felt that the petitioner had clearly purchased the property as one lot only finding out at <br /> the closing that they could appeal to try to separate it. Three separate tax bills have been sent out <br /> for the three parcels not 2 parcels. <br /> Decision: <br /> On a motion by Nyles Barnett and seconded by David Williams, the board voted 0 -5 to over -rule <br /> the Building Commissioners rulings. The motion for appeal failed and the Board upheld the <br /> Building Commissioner's ruling. <br />